More than twenty English councils have requested permission to delay their local elections scheduled for May, affecting over 2.5 million voters. The proposed postponements are linked to the government’s wide-ranging reorganisation of local government, which will replace many two-tier county and district councils with new unitary authorities. Ministers argue that holding elections for councils expected to be dissolved or restructured within a year would be costly, inefficient, and distracting from frontline services. Elections would instead be deferred until 2027. However, the move has sparked significant political controversy. Opposition parties have accused the government of undermining democratic accountability and avoiding voter scrutiny, warning that councillors could remain in office for extended periods without renewed mandates. Protests have erupted at some council meetings, highlighting public concern over transparency and trust in the democratic process. While ministers insist that national security, efficiency, and service delivery remain priorities, critics argue that postponing elections risks weakening public confidence in local government.

Assisted dying may not be available in England and Wales until at least 2029 after MPs approved extending the rollout period from two to four years. The delay was proposed by Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP behind the bill, who emphasised the importance of thoroughness over speed. Although she acknowledged supporters' disappointment, she believed a well-constructed law was paramount; the bill would return to the Commons in a 'safer, fairer, and more workable' form. Tom Gordon, a Liberal Democrat MP, warned the delay risked pushing the bill beyond the next general election, potentially leading to its abandonment. Critics argue the delay prolongs unnecessary suffering for terminally ill patients, while opponents worry it may pressure vulnerable individuals into ending their lives. Ms Leadbeater removed a safeguard requiring High Court scrutiny, proposing a panel including a lawyer, psychiatrist, and social worker instead. The bill initially passed with 330 MPs in favour and 275 against. See